ysobelle: (Default)
[personal profile] ysobelle
Hillary and Obama'd better stay nice to each other, cos they're probably going to be in the same ticket a few months from now.

I'm just sayin'.

Date: 2007-12-17 03:16 pm (UTC)
ext_4831: My Headshot (Cthulhu 2008)
From: [identity profile] hughcasey.livejournal.com
Actually, I don't think that either one will be VP on the other's ticket.

I think that whoever wins will take on Edwards as VP.

Both Clinton and Obama have a lot of people who dislike them, either for policy reasons, or because one's a woman and the other is black (it's sad, but true).

Edwards doesn't carry that baggage... there's no group out there that actively DISLIKES him. And he can help whoever wins the ticket carry the South (which anyone who want's to win the Presidency HAS to do).

Clinton/Edwards or Obama/Edwards. You heard it hear first.

Date: 2007-12-17 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autumnyte.livejournal.com
I agree with this, except I think Edwards is going to be the nominee for Pres.

Date: 2007-12-17 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] optimistprime.livejournal.com
Hill and Obama on the same ticket is a good way to insure a Republican in the White House. The only good thing there is either way, we loose a Bush!

It really stinks that capability and electability are so far removed from each other.

Date: 2007-12-17 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
Hell, I'm amazed Senator Clinton hasn't had Senator Obama "commit suicide" yet, as so many of her associates who crossed her have done in the past. I agree that Edwards will be the "go-to" running mate regardless of who wins the Democrat nomination.

Re: "commit suicide"?

Date: 2007-12-17 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murcury.livejournal.com
"Clang, clang, clang went the tinfoil..."

Re: "commit suicide"?

Date: 2007-12-17 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
No, it isn't funny at all.

Number of persons in the Clinton machine orbit who are alleged to have committed suicide: 9
Number known to have been murdered: 12
Number who died in plane crashes: 6
Number who died in single car automobile accidents: 3
Number of one-person sking fatalities: 1
Number of key witnesses who have died of heart attacks while in federal custody under questionable circumstances: 1
Number of unexplained deaths: 4
Total suspicious deaths: 36

Re: "commit suicide"?

Date: 2007-12-17 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blackbriar.livejournal.com
You can make a more effective list if you do a Google search for "Clinton Body Count" -- and it'll be just as real-world credible. You must be smarter than this.

Re: "commit suicide"?

Date: 2007-12-17 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
I haven't as much time as you seem to, besides, you've obviously missed the point entirely, so I'll let it go.

Re: "commit suicide"?

Date: 2007-12-17 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murcury.livejournal.com
Is this from Harper's?

Date: 2007-12-17 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murcury.livejournal.com
Next thing you'll be telling me 9-11 was an inside job.

Date: 2007-12-17 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
No, but if a proper response had been given to the first attack on the WTC, or any of the other U.S. interests attacked during the previous administration, perhaps it wouldn't be an issue.

Date: 2007-12-17 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] murcury.livejournal.com
No, but if a proper response had been given to the first attack on the WTC, or any of the other U.S. interests attacked during the previous administration, perhaps it wouldn't be an issue.


While I'm not a Clinton fan, I don't think that is a valid assessment.

Cases in point:

http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/clinton.htm
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=1995_register&docid=fr25ja95-126.pdf
http://www.cnn.com/US/9604/18/anti.terror.bill/index.html

If you want to talk about the Clinton Legacy vis a vis media consolidation, NAFTA and other trade agreements and what shithead moves they were, I'm right with you. But one shouldn't talk out of one's cloaca, yes?

Date: 2007-12-17 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blackbriar.livejournal.com
He haven't as much time as you seem to, besides, you've obviously missed the point entirely.

Date: 2007-12-17 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
"While I'm not a Clinton fan, I don't think that is a valid assessment".

Then let us agree to disagree on that point and stop co-opting Nikki's LJ.

Date: 2007-12-17 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surlywench.livejournal.com
she started it.

Date: 2007-12-18 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbroadfoot.livejournal.com
Yes, she did, the very day he "threw his hat in the ring" no less, but everyone expected her to go on the attack, just maybe not so soon. When you have no values and can't argue the issues, what else have you got to do?

July 2018

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2026 01:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios