Astana Politics
Jul. 9th, 2009 09:07 pmCross-posted from Facebook. When the hell did I become an essayist?
So Heather asked me a good question this morning, and I'm finally getting around to answering it as best I can. And of course, knowing me, there's not enough space to do so except in a note. So.
Heather Johnson: Please explain (you are the one that would know!): I've been following bits and pieces of the Tour. If Armstrong isn't the team lead and I know cycling places so much emphasis on the team perspective, what happened that he got the lead over his teammate, and why are they saying it's now a battle between him and his teammate? Wouldn't that cause considerable friction in the team? As much as I love Armstrong doesn't this just prove to the French that he can't take a backseat on anything and reaffirming that he is "pompous"? I'm confused.
Okay, this isn't a simple answer. Well, maybe it is. Lemme 'splain.
The press chatter about the "battle" between Contador and Armstrong's been going on since the second Armstrong announced he was coming out of retirement. It's not at all new. Armstrong would never go to any team but that which was being directed by his longtime friend and staunchest supporter, Johan Bruyneel. But Bruyneel had moved on after the collapse of the Discovery team to build Astana, to which he'd signed, among other current and rising cycling stars, the winner of the '08 Tour de France, Alberto Contador. So immediately, there was the question of who would be team leader: the guy who won the Tour seven times, or the guy who won it most recently.
Contador was, understandably, pretty miffed. He'd hoped-- like so many riders and spectators-- that once the dominating figure of Armstrong was out of the picture, other riders could show what they could do and make their own stars shine that much brighter. Early on in the season, and even during the Tour, he made a few inadvisable comments that, while understandable, showed how unhappy he was to be eclipsed, and were thus fairly unprofessional. No matter what goes on in the team meetings, never let your competitors see ANYTHING but a unified team front. Division in a team makes that team weak, and cycling is a brutal, unforgiving sport.
Everyone else on the team has been smart enough to hold to the party line, which not only shows unity, but has the added advantage of being true: whoever is the stronger rider will be revealed as the race progresses, and no matter who's on top at ay given stage, they're still a team with unbelievable power and breadth, not one but two past Tour winners, and perhaps three potential future winners, including Levi Leipheimer. As a team, no one can beat them-- that's what they all need to remember. It's the truth, and it shuts down the drama. Honestly, a team leader is appointed on the first day, or if there's one obvious star. But anything can happen on the road: circumstances change, and the team rides in support of whomever is strongest, smartest, and can get the best time. At present, in fact, Astana is officially riding in support of all three of their top men, any of whom could have a great day and seize the lead. That's just how it goes. Any rider can start as the favourite, and find himself a lieutenant if a teammate's legs prove stronger. Lance rode very well in the Giro d'Italia a few weeks ago, and showed he was riding into his top form. Everyone knew it. Including Contador. It's no surprise to anyone that he's currently strongest man on the team, no matter what the press may insinuate.
Also, though this might be something Contador doesn't really seem to want to admit (it's hard to see through the haze of sensationalism), Armstrong is eleven years older, much wiser, and will probably be part-owner of the team one day soon. Contador is a superstar, but possibly could still use an occasional pointer. The break in Stage Three wasn't a fluke: the Mistral blew the peloton into pieces, and Contador was stuck on the wrong side of that break. Armstrong knew how to read the wind, and grabbed the number three spot in the race. He knows these things. As he himself remarked, perhaps some people might be willing to finally admit he knew what he was doing. And sure enough, Contador spent the next few stages all but umbilically attached to the older rider.
As for the French, they are notoriously...well, French. Lance is exactly the type of personality they love to hate: cool, logical, determined, unsentimental, almost invincible, and American. The French are fanatical about their race and its history and traditions, its pomp and circumstance, and to them, Armstrong's just too businesslike about their beloved national obsession. Although, to be fair, they've warmed to him considerably since his early years-- helped, undoubtably, by Lance's learning French and working harder to court the French press. There are still, however, entirely too many people there who loathe him, and, unfortunately, a lot of them work in the Tour's infrastructure and French press. It sounds like a conspiracy theory to out-of-hand dismiss all the "scandalous doping revelations!" the French newspapers throw at him constantly, but sadly, some people just hate him that thoroughly. (This, by the way, is why I still think Floyd Landis got screwed.)
Also, scandal and conflict sell ad space. Newspapers, websites, and television commentators all know this, and it's in their best interests to play up internal strife that may or may not exist to the extent they say it does, without pointing out that these are grown men who know the realities of a giant, grueling game of moveable chess. Contador may bitch, but he's a smart guy, and in the end, he'll do whatever it takes to put his team on top, even if it means riding in support of someone else. And so will Lance.
Does that help?
So Heather asked me a good question this morning, and I'm finally getting around to answering it as best I can. And of course, knowing me, there's not enough space to do so except in a note. So.
Heather Johnson: Please explain (you are the one that would know!): I've been following bits and pieces of the Tour. If Armstrong isn't the team lead and I know cycling places so much emphasis on the team perspective, what happened that he got the lead over his teammate, and why are they saying it's now a battle between him and his teammate? Wouldn't that cause considerable friction in the team? As much as I love Armstrong doesn't this just prove to the French that he can't take a backseat on anything and reaffirming that he is "pompous"? I'm confused.
Okay, this isn't a simple answer. Well, maybe it is. Lemme 'splain.
The press chatter about the "battle" between Contador and Armstrong's been going on since the second Armstrong announced he was coming out of retirement. It's not at all new. Armstrong would never go to any team but that which was being directed by his longtime friend and staunchest supporter, Johan Bruyneel. But Bruyneel had moved on after the collapse of the Discovery team to build Astana, to which he'd signed, among other current and rising cycling stars, the winner of the '08 Tour de France, Alberto Contador. So immediately, there was the question of who would be team leader: the guy who won the Tour seven times, or the guy who won it most recently.
Contador was, understandably, pretty miffed. He'd hoped-- like so many riders and spectators-- that once the dominating figure of Armstrong was out of the picture, other riders could show what they could do and make their own stars shine that much brighter. Early on in the season, and even during the Tour, he made a few inadvisable comments that, while understandable, showed how unhappy he was to be eclipsed, and were thus fairly unprofessional. No matter what goes on in the team meetings, never let your competitors see ANYTHING but a unified team front. Division in a team makes that team weak, and cycling is a brutal, unforgiving sport.
Everyone else on the team has been smart enough to hold to the party line, which not only shows unity, but has the added advantage of being true: whoever is the stronger rider will be revealed as the race progresses, and no matter who's on top at ay given stage, they're still a team with unbelievable power and breadth, not one but two past Tour winners, and perhaps three potential future winners, including Levi Leipheimer. As a team, no one can beat them-- that's what they all need to remember. It's the truth, and it shuts down the drama. Honestly, a team leader is appointed on the first day, or if there's one obvious star. But anything can happen on the road: circumstances change, and the team rides in support of whomever is strongest, smartest, and can get the best time. At present, in fact, Astana is officially riding in support of all three of their top men, any of whom could have a great day and seize the lead. That's just how it goes. Any rider can start as the favourite, and find himself a lieutenant if a teammate's legs prove stronger. Lance rode very well in the Giro d'Italia a few weeks ago, and showed he was riding into his top form. Everyone knew it. Including Contador. It's no surprise to anyone that he's currently strongest man on the team, no matter what the press may insinuate.
Also, though this might be something Contador doesn't really seem to want to admit (it's hard to see through the haze of sensationalism), Armstrong is eleven years older, much wiser, and will probably be part-owner of the team one day soon. Contador is a superstar, but possibly could still use an occasional pointer. The break in Stage Three wasn't a fluke: the Mistral blew the peloton into pieces, and Contador was stuck on the wrong side of that break. Armstrong knew how to read the wind, and grabbed the number three spot in the race. He knows these things. As he himself remarked, perhaps some people might be willing to finally admit he knew what he was doing. And sure enough, Contador spent the next few stages all but umbilically attached to the older rider.
As for the French, they are notoriously...well, French. Lance is exactly the type of personality they love to hate: cool, logical, determined, unsentimental, almost invincible, and American. The French are fanatical about their race and its history and traditions, its pomp and circumstance, and to them, Armstrong's just too businesslike about their beloved national obsession. Although, to be fair, they've warmed to him considerably since his early years-- helped, undoubtably, by Lance's learning French and working harder to court the French press. There are still, however, entirely too many people there who loathe him, and, unfortunately, a lot of them work in the Tour's infrastructure and French press. It sounds like a conspiracy theory to out-of-hand dismiss all the "scandalous doping revelations!" the French newspapers throw at him constantly, but sadly, some people just hate him that thoroughly. (This, by the way, is why I still think Floyd Landis got screwed.)
Also, scandal and conflict sell ad space. Newspapers, websites, and television commentators all know this, and it's in their best interests to play up internal strife that may or may not exist to the extent they say it does, without pointing out that these are grown men who know the realities of a giant, grueling game of moveable chess. Contador may bitch, but he's a smart guy, and in the end, he'll do whatever it takes to put his team on top, even if it means riding in support of someone else. And so will Lance.
Does that help?